Top 30 Secondaries & Liquidity Platforms 2026

This report forms part of the Capital Ranking Venture Capital & Startup Financing series, which evaluates specialist venture capital firms, private-market infrastructure providers, startup-financing platforms, and institutional liquidity solutions active across global venture capital and private technology markets.

Secondaries and liquidity platforms have become essential infrastructure for a venture market in which ownership periods increasingly extend well beyond the assumptions made when employees, founders, limited partners, and early investors first committed capital. These platforms create routes to liquidity before an IPO, acquisition, fund termination, or other conventional exit.

The category encompasses several distinct operating models. Company-controlled platforms administer tender offers and recurring employee-liquidity programs. Private-share marketplaces connect qualified buyers and sellers in late-stage venture-backed companies. Institutional networks support broker-to-broker transactions and price discovery. Fund-interest platforms help limited partners transfer positions, while specialist financing firms address option-exercise costs, taxes, and concentrated private-company equity.

This ranking identifies platforms with sustained relevance to venture-backed liquidity, private securities infrastructure, employee equity, fund-interest transfers, or institutional secondary-market execution. It assesses category authority, operating substance, transaction capability, data quality, regulatory infrastructure, and current market position rather than ranking firms by the value of any single transaction or by investment returns.

Market Overview

The private secondary market is no longer a narrow mechanism used only near an expected IPO. It now supports recurring liquidity across the private-company lifecycle. Companies use tenders to retain employees, manage ownership, and provide orderly access to liquidity. Shareholders use marketplaces, brokers, and financing providers to convert part of a concentrated position into cash. Investors use secondary transactions to gain access to established private companies, rebalance portfolios, or acquire fund interests with greater visibility into underlying assets.

Private-company transactions remain structurally different from public-market trading. Transfer restrictions, rights of first refusal, company consent, investor-qualification rules, fragmented ownership records, limited disclosure, and uncertain valuations can all affect execution. A credible liquidity platform therefore requires more than a list of buyers and sellers. It must coordinate compliance, documentation, ownership verification, pricing, settlement, issuer controls, and the economics of the chosen transaction structure.

The wider private-capital secondaries market also influences venture liquidity. Limited partners sell venture and growth-fund interests to manage vintage exposure or obtain distributions, while general partners use continuation vehicles, portfolio sales, and structured transactions to retain assets while offering liquidity. Digital marketplaces and wealth platforms are making smaller fund positions more transferable, although these transactions remain operationally complex and frequently require manager consent.

Market infrastructure is becoming more specialized. Some firms compete through issuer relationships and tender administration; others through institutional order flow, broker networks, proprietary pricing data, or access to individual accredited investors. Employee-focused providers differentiate through option financing, tax analysis, wealth planning, and non-recourse structures. Fund-interest marketplaces emphasize standardized data rooms, qualified matching, and a wider pool of potential buyers.

Industry Trend — 2026

The central 2026 development is the normalization of private-market liquidity. William Blair’s 2026 Secondary Market Report estimated that the broad global secondaries market reached a record $220 billion in 2025, 42% above the previous year, and reported a market forecast of $250 billion for 2026. Those totals include LP-led and GP-led private-capital transactions across strategies and should not be read as venture-company share volume alone, but they demonstrate the institutional depth surrounding the category.

The narrower company-sponsored market is also expanding. Nasdaq Private Market’s Secondary Scene 2026 Outlook estimated that private-company tender volume reached $35 billion in 2025. Nearly half of the tender programs administered by NPM involved Seed through Series C companies, compared with approximately 30% two years earlier. Liquidity is therefore arriving earlier in the company lifecycle rather than being reserved exclusively for mature pre-IPO businesses.

Carta reported that it administered 71 tender offers totaling $3 billion in the first half of 2026, its strongest first-half dollar volume since 2022. The result reinforces a structural change in how venture-backed companies treat employee and investor liquidity: a tender is increasingly a repeatable equity-management tool rather than an exceptional substitute for an imminent exit.

Direct trading is also becoming more institutional. NPM reported that completed trades handled by its transfer and settlement operation increased from $372 million in 2024 to $673 million in 2025, while the number of issuers permitting direct secondary transfers rose from 12 to 31. Caplight and Zanbato continue to develop transaction-derived data and institutional order networks, while platforms such as Hiive and EquityZen broaden access to price indications and private-company opportunities.

Regulatory experimentation is widening the geographic market. The United Kingdom’s Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System, or PISCES, created a framework for controlled trading windows in private-company shares. JP Jenkins obtained authorization as a PISCES operator in 2025 and hosted the first transaction under the regime in March 2026. In Singapore, regulated digital private-market platforms continue to combine issuance, custody, and secondary trading, while Australia and continental Europe are developing region-specific marketplaces.

2026 market indicator	Current evidence	Implication for liquidity platforms
Broad global secondaries volume	$220 billion in 2025, up 42% year over year	Secondary transactions have become a core private-capital portfolio-management channel
2026 market expectation	$250 billion forecast in William Blair’s market survey	Execution capacity, buyer coverage, and institutional workflows remain strategically important
Private-company tenders	$35 billion in 2025 according to Nasdaq Private Market	Issuer-approved liquidity can operate at a scale comparable with major public-market issuance channels
Carta tender activity	71 tenders totaling $3 billion in H1 2026	Integrated cap-table and transaction infrastructure is becoming more valuable
Earlier-stage liquidity	Nearly 50% of NPM’s 2025 tender programs involved Seed through Series C companies	Liquidity infrastructure is becoming relevant before the conventional pre-IPO stage
Direct private-share transfers	NPM settlement volume rose from $372 million in 2024 to $673 million in 2025	Controlled block trading and reliable settlement are gaining institutional depth
Participating issuers	NPM settled direct trades in 31 companies in 2025, up from 12 in 2024	More issuers are permitting structured secondary activity
Venture-fund pricing	Average venture secondary pricing was reported at 78% of NAV in H1 2025	Price discovery, asset quality, and portfolio-level diligence remain central

Methodology — Core Eligibility Criteria

Firms considered for this ranking were required to satisfy the following core conditions:

• Operate a secondaries, private-share trading, liquidity, fund-interest transfer, employee-equity financing, or private-market transaction platform
• Serve venture-backed companies, startup shareholders, employees, founders, venture funds, limited partners, or institutional private-market participants
• Demonstrate active operations, a current market footprint, and identifiable transaction or infrastructure capability during the 2026 evaluation period
• Provide marketplace, brokerage, tender, financing, data, advisory, compliance, custody, settlement, or transaction-administration services directly relevant to private-market liquidity
• Maintain sufficient institutional substance, specialist authority, operating continuity, or market influence to justify inclusion
• Possess a clear connection to venture-backed shares, private technology companies, venture-fund interests, or the infrastructure through which those assets obtain liquidity

Inactive or bankrupt platforms, acquired brands that no longer maintained a meaningful operating identity, undifferentiated crowdfunding sites, broad financial-technology companies without a clear liquidity function, conventional stock exchanges without a distinct private-market platform, and duplicated parent-subsidiary entries were excluded or de-emphasized. A platform did not need to facilitate every type of secondary transaction, but its liquidity role had to be current, visible, and institutionally meaningful.

Methodology — Ranking Factors

The selected firms were evaluated using a combination of qualitative and structural factors:

• Strength, clarity, and continuity of the private-market liquidity identity
• Relevance to venture-backed company shares, venture-fund interests, or startup employee equity
• Scale and quality of transaction activity, issuer relationships, investor participation, or institutional order flow
• Capacity to administer tenders, auctions, block trades, bilateral transfers, fund-interest sales, or structured financing
• Quality of private-market data, price discovery, valuation intelligence, and transaction visibility
• Regulatory permissions, brokerage capability, investor qualification, compliance, and market-surveillance infrastructure
• Ownership verification, transfer-control, custody, escrow, documentation, and settlement capability
• Ability to support companies, founders, employees, investors, funds, wealth managers, brokers, or secondary buyers
• Integration with cap tables, equity plans, fund administration, special-purpose vehicles, or portfolio reporting
• Geographic reach and ability to navigate jurisdiction-specific securities and transfer rules
• Institutional credibility, specialist expertise, operating traceability, and organizational continuity
• Contribution to the development of issuer-controlled liquidity, employee financing, digital private markets, or fund-interest marketplaces
• Current product development and visible relevance during the 2026 evaluation period

The assessment universe comprised approximately 100 private-share marketplaces, tender administrators, secondary brokers, fund-interest platforms, employee-equity finance providers, private-market data companies, and regulated transaction-infrastructure firms. Thirty platforms were selected.

Tier classifications reflect relative institutional positioning within the secondaries and liquidity ecosystem. They do not constitute an investment recommendation, brokerage recommendation, transaction endorsement, valuation opinion, due-diligence conclusion, or assurance that liquidity will be available in any security or fund interest.

Company Profiles and Further Reference

Firm names appearing in this ranking are linked to their corresponding profiles in The Economy Wiki for companies, where available. These profiles provide additional background on each organization, including its principal activities, sector focus, market positioning, leadership, corporate information, and related rankings and analysis across The Economy Network.

The Economy Wiki profiles are maintained as editorial reference pages and may be updated as new public information becomes available.

---

Tier I — Leading Secondaries & Liquidity Platforms

Nasdaq Private Market

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2013

Nasdaq Private Market is one of the principal institutional platforms for company-sponsored liquidity, controlled tender offers, private-share trading, data, and transaction settlement. It serves private companies, employees, shareholders, institutional investors, and accredited entities seeking liquidity or access before an IPO, acquisition, or other conventional exit.

The platform’s defining strength is issuer-aligned execution. Private companies frequently want to provide liquidity without losing control over investor eligibility, transaction timing, transfer approvals, or cap-table composition. NPM supports structured programs that incorporate these constraints while coordinating documentation, ownership transfer, and settlement.

Its 2026 market data demonstrate the breadth of the franchise. NPM estimated that tenders reached $35 billion in 2025, while volume handled through its transfer and settlement team more than doubled to $673 million. The company also provides pricing and valuation intelligence, an investment platform, capital solutions, and equity-related wealth services.

Nasdaq Private Market fits Tier I because it combines issuer relationships, regulated execution, tenders, direct trading, data, and settlement within a single private-market institution. Its operating history and ability to support both organized liquidity programs and individual transactions make it a category benchmark.

Forge Global

• Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: 2014

Forge Global is a major marketplace and infrastructure provider for pre-IPO company shares. Its platform spans individual and institutional trading, company-sponsored liquidity programs, private-market data, indicative pricing, index products, custody, and investment vehicles designed to provide access to private-company exposure.

Forge’s strength lies in the breadth of its transaction stack. Investors can evaluate private companies through data and pricing tools, institutions can use dedicated trading workflows, shareholders can seek liquidity, and companies can organize controlled programs. The platform’s history also incorporates SharesPost, giving the combined organization a substantial legacy in online private-share transactions.

Charles Schwab completed its acquisition of Forge in March 2026, but Forge continues to operate under its own brand and maintain its marketplace, data products, regulated entities, and issuer relationships. The transaction gives the platform access to a much larger wealth and advisory network while preserving a recognizable specialist identity during the evaluation period.

Forge fits Tier I because it remains one of the most complete private-market platforms in the category. Its marketplace scale, pricing infrastructure, product breadth, and strategic relevance to a major financial institution give it a central position in the institutionalization of private-company investing.

Carta

• Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: 2012

Carta is a major equity and fund infrastructure platform whose liquidity capability is directly integrated with cap-table management, employee ownership records, valuations, fund administration, and private-company governance. It supports tender offers and secondary transactions in an environment where accurate ownership data and issuer approval are indispensable.

The platform’s structural advantage comes from its embedded position in the private-company lifecycle. A liquidity event depends on knowing who owns which security, what restrictions apply, how employee awards have vested, which approvals are required, and how the completed transaction changes the cap table. Carta can coordinate those elements within the same operating system used to administer equity.

Carta reported 71 tender offers totaling $3 billion in the first half of 2026, the highest first-half dollar volume on its platform since 2022. This activity indicates that its liquidity function is not merely an adjacent software feature; it is a meaningful transaction capability built on a broad equity-administration base.

Carta fits Tier I because it connects liquidity with the underlying system of record. Its combination of cap-table reach, fund infrastructure, transaction administration, and current tender volume gives it a differentiated role from marketplaces that begin only when a buyer and seller seek to trade.

Hiive

• Headquarters: Vancouver, Canada
• Founded: 2021

Hiive is a marketplace for buying and selling shares of venture-backed private companies. It has developed a prominent position by giving qualified participants direct visibility into bids, asks, transaction interest, and company-specific secondary-market conditions.

The platform is designed around transparent marketplace interaction rather than a purely broker-mediated process. That orientation is significant in a market where participants have historically relied on fragmented indications, limited comparable data, and bilateral introductions. Hiive combines market visibility with transaction support and the controls required for private securities.

Its rapid institutional development reflects demand for more accessible pre-IPO price discovery. The platform also publishes market research and company-level information, helping participants interpret trading conditions without treating a last financing round as the only relevant valuation reference.

Hiive fits Tier I because it has become one of the most visible independent brands in direct private-company share trading. Its focused category identity, active marketplace model, data orientation, and growth in a short operating period give it a leading position in the 2026 market.

Zanbato

• Headquarters: Mountain View, United States
• Founded: 2010

Zanbato is an institutional private-securities platform built around broker networks, transaction execution, and secondary-market data. Its ZX platform supports inter-broker trading in private shares, while ZXData provides information derived from institutional, non-tender transaction activity and private-company fund marks.

The firm addresses a part of the market that is less visible to individual shareholders but essential to institutional liquidity. Large private-share trades often involve brokers, funds, family offices, and professional counterparties that require verified access, efficient communication, regulatory capability, and reliable execution.

Zanbato’s data franchise reinforces its marketplace role. Monthly pricing reports, institutional marks, and transaction-derived intelligence help participants interpret a market in which quoted prices may differ materially by structure, share class, transfer rights, and counterparty quality.

Zanbato fits Tier I because of its specialist longevity, institutional network, regulated US and UK capabilities, and combination of execution with market data. It remains one of the clearest infrastructure providers for professional private-share trading.

---

Tier II — Established Secondaries & Liquidity Platforms

(Alphabetical order)

Caplight

• Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: 2021

Caplight is an institutional private-market data and trading platform focused on transaction-derived pricing, order flow, company intelligence, and liquidity. It connects market participants seeking information and execution across venture-backed private companies.

The platform’s principal distinction is its effort to make fragmented secondary activity analytically useful. It aggregates bids, asks, closed trades, funding rounds, institutional marks, and other market signals into pricing and company-level tools. Caplight also operates an institutional marketplace linking vetted counterparties.

By 2026, the company reported more than $300 billion of proprietary secondary transaction data, over $5 billion of live transaction opportunities, and a network of more than 700 institutional participants. A $16 million financing led by BlackRock and Fin Capital further strengthened its position.

Caplight fits Tier II because its institutional adoption and data depth are substantial, while its operating history remains shorter than that of the leading platforms. Its combination of pricing intelligence and executable market access makes it one of the category’s strongest emerging institutions.

Crowdcube

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2011

Crowdcube is a European private-company investment platform with an increasingly important secondary-liquidity franchise. Originally associated primarily with equity crowdfunding, it now supports employee and shareholder transactions, company-controlled liquidity, investor administration, and access to later-stage private-company opportunities.

The firm’s relevance increased as the United Kingdom developed PISCES. Crowdcube has built regulated workflows and shareholder infrastructure that can support company-approved transactions while preserving issuer control over participants, timing, and allocation.

Its 2026 activity included substantial employee-liquidity mandates involving major UK technology and financial companies. These transactions demonstrate that the platform is moving beyond occasional crowdfunding resales toward institutionally meaningful secondary programs.

Crowdcube fits Tier II because it combines a large investor community, established private-company infrastructure, and a rapidly developing UK liquidity capability. Its original business is broader than secondaries, but its current market position is directly relevant to the category.

Equitybee

• Headquarters: Palo Alto, United States
• Founded: 2017

Equitybee is an employee stock-option financing platform that helps startup employees fund the cost of exercising vested options. It connects employees with accredited investors, allowing employees to obtain exercise capital while retaining an economic interest in a potential future exit.

The platform addresses one of the most persistent liquidity problems in venture-backed employment. Options can have substantial paper value but require cash for the exercise price and associated taxes before an employee has access to sale proceeds. Leaving a company can make the issue more urgent because the exercise window may be limited.

Equitybee reported more than $317 million in total volume across over 890 portfolio companies and more than 2,800 new shareholders by 2026. Its focused model and accumulated transaction base give it greater category substance than a general equity-education or cap-table tool.

Equitybee fits Tier II because option financing is a distinct and important part of the liquidity ecosystem. Its specialization, scale, investor network, and direct connection to startup employee ownership support its established position.

EquityZen

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2013

EquityZen is an established private-company marketplace that connects eligible shareholders with accredited investors through direct and fund-based transaction structures. It provides access to pre-IPO companies while giving employees and other early holders a route to partial liquidity.

The platform combines marketplace access with investment vehicles, transaction administration, company research, and secondary resale functionality for eligible positions. This structure can simplify cap-table outcomes for issuers while allowing investors to participate at lower amounts than many direct institutional block trades require.

By 2026, EquityZen reported more than 54,000 private placements across over 500 companies and a network exceeding 470,000 accredited investors. Its securities subsidiary operates as part of Morgan Stanley while the EquityZen brand remains active and separately identifiable.

EquityZen fits Tier II because of its longevity, transaction record, investor network, and strong category recognition. It sits below Tier I because its model is oriented more toward facilitated investment access than toward the full issuer, institutional trading, data, and settlement stack.

JP Jenkins

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 1991

JP Jenkins is a long-established UK marketplace for private and unquoted company shares. It operates a matched-bargain facility and an authorized PISCES private market, providing trading infrastructure for companies and shareholders that require liquidity outside a conventional public listing.

The platform combines broker connectivity, electronic order matching, issuer services, and regulated intermittent trading. Its history extends to the original OFEX market, while its current infrastructure reflects investment by technology group InfinitX and renewed demand from private companies and businesses leaving public junior markets.

JP Jenkins became the second authorized UK PISCES operator in 2025 and hosted the regime’s first transaction in March 2026. The platform reports connections with more than 40 UK brokers and a marketplace covering a substantial group of unlisted securities.

JP Jenkins fits Tier II because it combines unusual operating longevity with current regulatory relevance. Its geographic reach is narrower than that of the leading global platforms, but its role in establishing the UK’s controlled private-share market gives it significant category authority.

Manhattan Venture Partners

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2014

Manhattan Venture Partners is a private-market investment and secondary platform focused on late-stage venture-backed companies. It provides access through direct secondary transactions, special-purpose vehicles, and investment structures designed around mature private technology businesses.

The firm’s strength lies in sourcing and evaluating companies that have progressed beyond conventional early-stage venture financing but have not yet entered the public market. These transactions require shareholder access, company knowledge, structure selection, and the ability to coordinate investors around relatively concentrated opportunities.

Its model is more investment-led than the exchange-like platforms in Tier I, but that specialization can be valuable where access and transaction formation matter more than continuous marketplace liquidity.

Manhattan Venture Partners fits Tier II because it maintains a recognizable franchise in late-stage private-company exposure and shareholder liquidity. Its long-running pre-IPO focus and transaction experience distinguish it from general venture funds or undifferentiated investment syndicates.

Moonfare

• Headquarters: Berlin, Germany
• Founded: 2016

Moonfare is a digital private-markets investment platform providing eligible investors with access to private-equity funds, portfolios, co-investments, and secondary opportunities. It also operates a secondary market through which qualifying investors may seek to sell eligible fund allocations before maturity.

The platform is relevant to venture liquidity at the fund-interest level. Private-equity and venture-fund commitments can remain illiquid for a decade or longer, while investors’ portfolio requirements may change. A technology-enabled transfer channel can improve access to buyers, documentation, and transaction coordination without suggesting that liquidity is guaranteed.

Moonfare’s international investor base and institutional fund relationships give it scale beyond a small bulletin-board marketplace. Its research, portfolio tools, and wealth-oriented access model also reflect the increasing participation of private clients in secondaries.

Moonfare fits Tier II because it combines a substantial international platform with a visible secondary-market function. Its broader private-equity orientation reduces its category purity, but its scale and fund-liquidity role justify established-tier inclusion.

Palico

• Headquarters: Paris, France
• Founded: 2012

Palico is a digital marketplace dedicated to buying and selling private-fund interests. It connects limited partners, general partners, advisers, and qualified buyers around smaller and mid-sized secondary transactions that can be inefficient for traditional intermediaries to execute manually.

Its specialist value lies in standardization. Fund-interest sales require information about the manager, strategy, vintage, commitments, unfunded obligations, net asset value, transfer restrictions, and buyer eligibility. Palico provides an organized environment for presenting positions, identifying interest, and advancing transactions.

The platform expands access to a segment historically dominated by large advisory mandates. This is relevant to venture funds, where individual LP positions may be too small for a conventional auction but still meaningful to the seller and prospective buyers.

Palico fits Tier II because fund-interest secondaries are a core part of private-market liquidity and because the platform maintains a clear, dedicated category identity. Its scope is narrower than a full private-share marketplace, but its specialization is institutionally significant.

Secfi

• Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: 2017

Secfi is an equity-planning, financing, liquidity, and wealth platform focused on startup employees and executives. Its services include option-exercise financing, non-recourse structures, secondary sales, equity analysis, diversified funds, and tailored private-company investment vehicles.

The platform addresses the full decision process surrounding concentrated startup equity. Employees must evaluate exercise cost, alternative minimum tax, future dilution, holding periods, company prospects, sale availability, and personal financial concentration. Secfi combines software and professional support around these interdependent choices.

By 2026, Secfi reported approximately 55,000 startup employees using its planning tools, $90 billion of equity registered on the platform, and $790 million provided to startup employees. Its development into secondaries and asset management broadens the original financing proposition.

Secfi fits Tier II because it has established substantial scale in employee-level liquidity and equity decision support. It is not a general marketplace, but its integrated financing, sale, planning, and investment capabilities give it a durable position in the venture liquidity stack.

Setter Capital

• Headquarters: Toronto, Canada
• Founded: 2006

Setter Capital is a secondary-market advisory and research firm focused on private-fund interests, direct investments, and alternative assets. Its work spans venture capital, private equity, infrastructure, real estate, real assets, private credit, and other illiquid strategies.

The firm is known for buyer coverage, market research, pricing intelligence, and transaction advice. In fragmented secondary markets, the ability to identify credible counterparties and compare pricing across funds, vintages, strategies, and transaction structures can materially affect execution.

Setter’s inclusion recognizes that not every important liquidity platform is a continuous electronic marketplace. Advisory networks and proprietary market data remain essential for positions that require confidentiality, negotiated diligence, manager consent, and a tailored process.

Setter Capital fits Tier II because it maintains a long-running specialist identity and direct relevance to venture-fund and private-asset liquidity. Its cross-asset scope is broad, but secondaries remain the center of the franchise.

---

Tier III — Specialist Secondaries & Liquidity Platforms

(Alphabetical order)

ADDX

• Headquarters: Singapore
• Founded: 2017

ADDX is a regulated digital private-market platform providing access to private equity, private credit, funds, structured products, bonds, and other alternative assets. It uses digital-security infrastructure to support issuance, custody, investor access, and trading.

The platform’s relevance to liquidity lies in its regulated exchange and post-issuance infrastructure. Private assets can be divided into smaller investment units and administered within a controlled system, potentially widening participation and creating more structured routes for eligible secondary transactions.

ADDX fits Tier III because it brings credible Singaporean regulatory and digital-market infrastructure to the ranking. Its asset coverage extends well beyond venture-backed shares, but its role in developing tradable private-market instruments makes it a meaningful specialist platform.

Alta

• Headquarters: Singapore
• Founded: 2015

Alta is an alternative-investment platform serving issuers, investors, and institutions across private-market capital formation and secondary trading. The business developed from Fundnel and expanded its exchange capability through the integration of Hg Exchange.

Its model combines deal access, tokenization and digital administration, investor onboarding, and regulated market infrastructure. This is relevant in Southeast Asia, where private-company and fund liquidity must operate across differing legal systems, investor bases, and asset structures.

Alta fits Tier III because it provides an established regional alternative to US and European private-market venues. Its coverage is broader than venture secondaries alone, but its Singapore base, institutional orientation, and secondary infrastructure give it clear category relevance.

Augment

• Headquarters: Austin, United States
• Founded: 2022

Augment is a private-stock marketplace focused on transactions in shares of late-stage venture-backed companies. It supports buyers, sellers, and brokers seeking clearer pricing, organized workflows, and access to private-company opportunities.

The platform is designed for a market in which participants often manage indications and documentation across disconnected channels. By concentrating interest and transaction information, Augment seeks to reduce friction around discovery and execution.

Augment fits Tier III because it has a highly specific category identity and modern marketplace design. Its shorter operating history and smaller institutional footprint keep it below more established platforms, but its focus makes it a credible specialist inclusion.

Collective Liquidity

• Headquarters: San Luis Obispo, United States
• Founded: 2021

Collective Liquidity provides liquidity and wealth solutions for founders, executives, employees, and investors with concentrated private-company equity. Its model combines transaction support with diversification, planning, and analysis of the holder’s wider financial position.

This approach recognizes that a private-share sale is often not an isolated event. A shareholder may need to compare tender participation, direct sale, financing, tax exposure, concentration risk, and the consequences of retaining future upside.

Collective Liquidity fits Tier III because it brings a shareholder-advisory model to a market dominated by exchanges and brokers. Its institutional scale is still developing, but its specialization addresses a genuine gap in venture-backed wealth and liquidity planning.

ESO Fund

• Headquarters: San Mateo, United States
• Founded: 2012

ESO Fund provides financing to employees of venture-backed companies who need capital to exercise stock options and meet associated tax obligations. Its structures are intended to reduce the immediate cash burden while allowing employees to retain exposure to a future company exit.

The firm addresses a narrowly defined but structurally important problem. Employees can lose valuable vested options because they lack the capital or risk tolerance required to exercise before a deadline, particularly after leaving a company.

ESO Fund fits Tier III because it has a long operating history in employee option finance and a clear connection to pre-exit liquidity. Its model is narrower than a marketplace or integrated equity platform, but that specialization adds important coverage to the ranking.

Floww

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2016

Floww provides regulated infrastructure for private-market deal creation, distribution, investor onboarding, execution, custody, and settlement. It serves deal sponsors, fund managers, brokers, syndicates, investor communities, and scaling companies through configurable deal rooms and transaction workflows.

The platform’s significance lies in enabling other market participants to create controlled private markets. Users can manage KYC and AML, documentation, allocation, investor communications, order processes, and settlement under UK and US regulatory permissions.

Floww fits Tier III because it is an infrastructure provider rather than a high-volume branded secondary marketplace. Its cross-border regulatory model and modular operating system nevertheless make it relevant to institutions building private-share and fund-liquidity channels.

Funderbeam

• Headquarters: London / Tallinn, United Kingdom / Estonia
• Founded: 2013

Funderbeam is a private-company funding and trading platform that combines primary investment access with a secondary marketplace. It has developed a cross-border identity around growth companies, investor communities, and technology-enabled transfer of private securities.

The platform offers an alternative to the predominantly US pre-IPO market by supporting companies and investors from a wider range of European and international ecosystems. Its trading function gives holders a potential route to sell positions subject to platform rules, demand, and applicable restrictions.

Funderbeam fits Tier III because it maintains a visible secondary-market capability and a long specialist operating history. Its scale and current institutional depth are below the leading platforms, but its international orientation gives the ranking useful geographic breadth.

MicroVentures

• Headquarters: Austin, United States
• Founded: 2009

MicroVentures is an online private-investment platform offering access to startups, growth companies, funds, and selected secondary opportunities. It combines broker-dealer infrastructure with an investor platform serving accredited and, for eligible offerings, broader investor groups.

Its relevance to this category comes from facilitating access to private-company shares and investment vehicles outside conventional institutional venture funds. The firm’s long operating history also reflects the development of online private securities from a niche crowdfunding activity into a more regulated investment channel.

MicroVentures fits Tier III because its platform is broader than secondaries and does not provide the same continuous market depth as the leading exchanges. It nevertheless remains an established participant in online private-company access and transaction infrastructure.

North Capital

• Headquarters: Salt Lake City, United States
• Founded: 2008

North Capital provides regulatory technology, broker-dealer services, escrow, custody coordination, offering infrastructure, and secondary-market support for private securities and investment funds. Its capabilities are frequently used by other platforms, issuers, and asset managers rather than marketed solely as a consumer-facing marketplace.

The firm’s value lies in the regulated operating layer. Private transactions require investor verification, subscriptions, payments, documentation, books and records, and in some cases alternative trading or qualified matching services. North Capital helps institutions assemble these functions within a compliant workflow.

North Capital fits Tier III because it is broader financial infrastructure rather than a venture-secondaries specialist brand. Its long experience and direct contribution to private-securities execution nonetheless make it an important part of the liquidity ecosystem.

PrimaryMarkets

• Headquarters: Sydney, Australia
• Founded: 2015

PrimaryMarkets operates an Australian marketplace for trading shares in unlisted companies. It provides companies and shareholders with an organized mechanism for managing indications, transactions, and investor access outside a public exchange listing.

The platform addresses a regional market that is often underrepresented in global private-share rankings. Australian growth companies, early investors, employees, and private shareholders face the same extended holding periods and fragmented liquidity conditions found in larger venture ecosystems.

PrimaryMarkets fits Tier III because it offers a clear, category-specific secondary-market service with established local positioning. Its geographic scale is narrower than that of global platforms, but its role in Australian unlisted-company trading makes it a credible specialist.

Quid

• Headquarters: Los Angeles, United States
• Founded: 2018

Quid provides financing secured against equity in high-growth private companies. It is designed for employees, founders, and other shareholders who require capital before an IPO or acquisition but do not necessarily want to sell their entire economic interest.

Share-backed financing can address exercise costs, taxes, personal liquidity, or diversification needs, although underwriting private equity requires careful attention to company quality, transfer restrictions, valuation, and exit uncertainty. Quid specializes in structuring around these constraints.

Quid fits Tier III because financing is a narrower form of liquidity than an organized marketplace. Its focused private-company model nevertheless gives shareholders an alternative to an outright secondary sale and adds an important structured-liquidity capability to the ranking.

Rainmaker Securities

• Headquarters: Miami / Chicago, United States
• Founded: 2004

Rainmaker Securities is a registered broker-dealer focused on pre-IPO and late-stage private-company transactions. It facilitates sales for existing shareholders and provides qualified buyers with access to venture-backed growth companies.

The firm represents the relationship-driven brokerage layer of the market. Transactions may depend on locating a suitable counterparty, negotiating price and structure, confirming ownership, navigating company approvals, and completing documentation rather than matching anonymously on a continuous exchange.

Rainmaker Securities fits Tier III because it is a specialist broker rather than a broad technology platform. Its long operating history and direct focus on private-company liquidity support inclusion, while its narrower infrastructure and data footprint keep it below the established tier.

Republic Europe

• Headquarters: London / Dublin, United Kingdom / Ireland
• Founded: 2009

Republic Europe is the current brand of the Seedrs private-company investment platform in the United Kingdom and European Union. It provides primary fundraising, investor administration, and a secondary market through which eligible investors can buy and sell interests subject to company participation and platform rules.

Its nominee and investor-management structure can make secondary transfers more manageable than transactions involving numerous direct cap-table holders. The platform also serves a large community that originally entered private companies through crowdfunding rounds.

Republic Europe fits Tier III because its secondary function is meaningful but remains part of a broader startup-investment platform. Its UK and Irish regulatory presence, long operating history, and established investor base give it stronger category relevance than a general crowdfunding site.

SeedBlink

• Headquarters: Bucharest / Amsterdam, Romania / Netherlands
• Founded: 2020

SeedBlink is a European venture-investment and equity-management platform offering startup financing, cap-table tools, syndicate infrastructure, and a dedicated secondaries service. It supports shareholders and companies seeking organized transfers in mature private businesses.

The secondaries platform handles investor onboarding, KYC and AML checks, data rooms, transaction documents, signatures, investment vehicles, and share transfers. Companies can retain control over the design and permitted participants, while investors can access selected pre-IPO opportunities.

SeedBlink fits Tier III because it brings a distinct continental-European venture focus to private-share liquidity. Its secondary franchise is newer and smaller than those of the global leaders, but its integrated company, investor, and equity infrastructure makes it a credible specialist platform.

Templum

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2017

Templum provides technology and regulated infrastructure for alternative investments and secondary transactions. Its capabilities include negotiated trading, central limit order books, qualified matching services for partnership interests, broker-dealer and alternative trading system support, tender workflows, investor onboarding, payments, and document execution.

The firm’s model is primarily infrastructure-led. Banks, broker-dealers, fintech firms, wealth managers, and other providers can use white-label, API-integrated, or hybrid deployments to create private-market investment and liquidity experiences under their own brands.

Templum fits Tier III because it enables secondary markets rather than relying on a single dominant marketplace audience. Its transaction breadth and regulatory tools are substantial, but its broader alternatives orientation and indirect model place it in the specialist tier.

---

Remarks

Secondaries and liquidity platforms now form a diverse institutional layer between private ownership and conventional exit markets. The selected firms cover company-sponsored tenders, institutional private-share trading, employee option finance, shareholder lending, fund-interest marketplaces, regulated digital securities, broker-led transactions, and the infrastructure required to administer each model.

The 2026 market favors platforms that can combine access with control. Liquidity is valuable only when transactions respect issuer approvals, investor eligibility, ownership records, securities regulation, tax constraints, confidentiality, and reliable settlement. Data and visible order flow can improve price discovery, but private-company values remain sensitive to share class, structure, rights, information quality, and transaction-specific restrictions.

No platform can guarantee that a buyer, seller, financing provider, or acceptable price will be available. The strongest organizations distinguish themselves through operating continuity, transparent processes, credible counterparties, institutional data, and the ability to coordinate complex transactions without treating private securities as if they were freely tradable public shares.

Tier classification reflects relative institutional positioning within the secondaries and liquidity platform segment. It does not represent investment performance, transaction quality, creditworthiness, regulatory approval of any specific offering, or an endorsement of any platform, security, fund, valuation, or liquidity strategy.

---

Recognition

Inclusion in the Top 30 Secondaries & Liquidity Platforms 2026 ranking is an editorial determination of The Economy Rankings and is independent of licensing, advertising, sponsorship, or other commercial participation.

Ranked organizations may factually refer to their inclusion in the ranking in their own communications. When describing the result, firms should accurately reflect the tier structure and methodology used in the published ranking.

How the ranking should be interpreted

• Tier I represents the Top 5 firms, and the published order within Tier I reflects the ranking order.
• Tier II represents firms ranked within the Top 15, following Tier I. Firms within Tier II are displayed alphabetically; their displayed order should therefore not be interpreted as an individual numerical ranking.
• Tier III represents firms ranked within the Top 30, following Tiers I and II. Firms within Tier III are also displayed alphabetically, and their displayed order should not be interpreted as an individual numerical ranking.
• A firm's tier, rather than its alphabetical position within Tier II or Tier III, should therefore be used when describing its standing.

Referencing the ranking

Depending on the firm's published tier, appropriate factual descriptions may include:

• Tier I: “Ranked Tier I” or “Ranked among the Top 5”
• Tier II: “Ranked Tier II” or “Ranked among the Top 15”
• Tier III: “Ranked Tier III” or “Ranked among the Top 30”

Firms should not describe an alphabetical position within Tier II or Tier III as a specific numerical rank.

Use of The Economy Rankings recognition materials

Editorial inclusion in a ranking does NOT by itself grant permission to use The Economy Rankings badges, seals, logos, official recognition graphics, licensed quotations, or other proprietary recognition materials.

Organizations wishing to use official The Economy Rankings recognition materials in corporate websites, marketing materials, investor communications, client presentations, social media, press releases, or other external communications should refer to the applicable licensing terms and usage policies:

• The Economy Rankings License Structure — available licence levels and permitted recognition uses
  Rankings License Structure | The Economy
• The Economy Rankings License Policy — licensing conditions governing use of The Economy Rankings recognition, marks, and related materials
  The Economy Rankings License Policy | The Economy
• Recognition Use Guide — guidance on permitted wording, presentation, attribution, and use of ranking recognition
  Recognition Use Guide | The Economy

Ranking inclusion remains editorially independent regardless of whether an organization purchases or holds a recognition-materials licence.

Recognized institutions may reference the designation in:

• corporate websites
• investor communications
• marketing materials
• client presentations

Licensing inquiries:
[email protected]