Top 30 Venture Capital Advisory & Placement 2026

This report forms part of the Capital Ranking Venture Capital series, which evaluates specialist venture investors, startup-financing platforms, and private-market institutions across major strategy and company-development categories.

Venture capital advisory and placement firms help venture managers, growth-equity firms, emerging managers, and specialist technology investors raise capital from limited partners. Their work can include fund positioning, fundraising strategy, investor-material preparation, LP targeting, roadshow execution, diligence management, co-investment syndication, secondary advisory, GP capital solutions, and long-term investor-relations support.

The category is distinct from direct venture investing. A venture firm selects companies and manages investment portfolios; a placement adviser helps the firm explain its strategy, institutionalize its fundraising process, and reach investors whose mandates fit the proposed fund. The strongest advisers understand both sides of the relationship: how managers build differentiated portfolios and how pensions, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, foundations, insurers, family offices, consultants, and private-wealth platforms evaluate those managers.

This work has become more demanding as the venture market has divided between a small number of highly successful franchises and a much larger group of managers facing longer fundraising cycles. Brand recognition alone is rarely sufficient for emerging, regional, sector-focused, or successor funds. Managers must provide credible evidence of sourcing advantage, portfolio construction, reserve policy, team stability, valuation discipline, realizations, and an opportunity set appropriate to the proposed fund size.

This ranking identifies independent and operationally distinct advisory platforms with sustained relevance to venture capital, growth equity, emerging managers, technology funds, and related private-market capital formation. It evaluates institutional position, fundraising capability, investor access, venture relevance, geographic reach, strategic depth, and current organizational continuity rather than ranking firms by one mandate, one reported fund close, aggregate capital raised, or a single client outcome.

Market Overview

Fund placement is a relationship-intensive professional service. A placement agent cannot manufacture an investment track record or substitute for the general partner during diligence. Its value lies in helping a credible manager present the strategy clearly, identify realistic investors, sequence outreach, interpret market feedback, maintain process discipline, and avoid spending scarce time on LPs whose mandates do not fit.

Venture fundraising creates particular challenges. Many venture funds are smaller than buyout, infrastructure, or credit vehicles, reducing the fee pool available to a traditional global agent. Some established venture firms also maintain direct LP relationships and prefer to control fundraising internally. The advisory opportunity is therefore strongest where a manager needs new geographic coverage, institutional positioning, emerging-manager support, private-wealth access, or a solution that connects a primary fundraise with co-investments, secondaries, or GP-level capital.

The market includes several operating models. Large independent placement firms provide global project management and institutional distribution. Regional specialists concentrate on the Gulf, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, or selected European markets. Emerging-manager advisers work with smaller first- through fifth-generation funds. Network and broker-dealer platforms provide regulated infrastructure to independent capital raisers, while strategic boutiques may begin with positioning and materials before conducting a narrower investor process.

These models are not interchangeable. A global multi-billion-dollar growth fund requires different investor coverage and project resources from a first-time seed fund. A US manager seeking Gulf sovereign and family-office capital needs different local knowledge from a European deep-tech manager approaching development institutions and fund-of-funds. The ranking therefore considers the credibility of each firm within its intended mandate segment rather than treating the widest office network as the only measure of quality.

Liquidity has also become part of capital formation. Venture managers may need to raise a successor fund while offering liquidity in older vehicles, syndicating co-investments, restructuring a mature portfolio, arranging a continuation solution, or addressing LP concentration. Advisers that understand both primary fundraising and secondary transactions can help managers coordinate these objectives without presenting them as unrelated exercises.

Industry Trend — 2026

The 2026 fundraising environment combines strong headline venture investment with concentrated access to manager capital. KPMG’s Q2 2026 Venture Pulse recorded $227.4 billion of global venture investment across 8,440 deals, following a record $332.9 billion in the first quarter. Exceptional artificial-intelligence financings materially influenced both totals.

Fundraising conditions are less uniformly strong. The NVCA 2026 Yearbook reported that US venture firms raised $67 billion across 585 funds in 2025. The ten largest funds captured $22 billion, or 32.9% of the total, while only 101 first-time funds were formed—the lowest number since 2011. KPMG reported $72.4 billion of US venture fundraising in the first half of 2026, but large flagship closes were an important part of that recovery.

This divergence increases the value of disciplined positioning. An adviser must help an established platform explain why a larger successor fund can preserve its strategy, while helping a smaller manager demonstrate why sector expertise, regional access, founder networks, or fund-size discipline create an investable edge. Generic claims about access to innovation or artificial intelligence are unlikely to differentiate a manager in an LP market that can compare many similar proposals.

Liquidity remains central to fundraising conversations. NVCA reported $217.1 billion of US venture-backed exit value across 1,463 transactions in 2025, a major improvement but not a complete solution to the backlog of mature private companies. Jefferies estimated that the wider private-capital secondary market reached $240 billion in 2025, split between $125 billion of LP-led and $115 billion of GP-led activity. Venture and growth interests traded at an average 78% of net asset value.

The resulting advisory market rewards firms that can integrate fundraising execution with realistic market feedback, differentiated investor coverage, and liquidity awareness. Scale remains valuable, but independent specialists also have an opening where managers require senior attention, regional access, or support for fund sizes that are uneconomic for the largest placement franchises.

2026 capital-formation indicator	Current evidence	Implication for venture advisory and placement firms
Global venture investment	$227.4 billion across 8,440 deals in Q2 2026, after $332.9 billion in Q1	Strong headline deployment does not imply equally broad fundraising conditions for venture managers
US venture fundraising in 2025	$67 billion across 585 funds	A substantial manager market remains active, but successful closes are selective
Fundraising concentration	The ten largest US funds captured $22 billion, or 32.9% of 2025 capital	Advisers must differentiate subscale and specialist managers against powerful flagship franchises
First-time fund formation	101 US first-time funds in 2025, the lowest number since 2011	Emerging-manager mandates require deeper institutional preparation and more realistic LP targeting
US venture fundraising in H1 2026	$72.4 billion, supported materially by large flagship closes	Headline recovery can coexist with difficult conditions for smaller and newer funds
US venture-backed exits	$217.1 billion across 1,463 transactions in 2025	Improved exit value supports fundraising, but distributions and unrealized portfolios remain central diligence issues
Global private-capital secondaries	$240 billion in 2025: $125 billion LP-led and $115 billion GP-led	Primary fundraising increasingly intersects with LP liquidity, continuation vehicles, and portfolio solutions
Venture and growth secondary pricing	Average 78% of NAV in 2025	Advisers need credible valuation and liquidity context when positioning mature venture portfolios

KPMG and NVCA measure venture investment and fundraising, while Jefferies measures the broader private-capital secondary market. Their geographic coverage, transaction universes, and methodologies differ. The figures should be read as complementary indicators of the environment facing venture managers rather than combined into one market total.

Methodology — Core Eligibility Criteria

Firms considered for this ranking were required to satisfy the following core conditions:

• Operate as an independent or operationally distinct private-capital placement agent, fundraising adviser, GP adviser, capital-solutions firm, or regulated capital-formation platform
• Demonstrate identifiable relevance to venture capital, growth equity, technology funds, emerging managers, regional venture strategies, or innovation-oriented private-market fundraising
• Provide substantive support in fund positioning, LP targeting, primary fundraising, investor communication, diligence management, co-investments, direct placements, secondaries, or related GP capital solutions
• Maintain traceable current activity, an identifiable advisory team, and an active organizational presence during the 2026 evaluation period
• Possess institutional, family-office, private-wealth, sovereign, development-finance, or regional investor relationships relevant to the mandates it serves
• Show sufficient strategic depth, execution capability, regulatory infrastructure, geographic access, or specialist authority to justify inclusion

Bank-owned placement groups, acquired brands without a meaningful continuing identity, inactive or insolvent firms, corporate venture arms, direct investment managers without an advisory franchise, investor databases without substantive advisory execution, unregulated introducers presented as full placement agents, and generic financial intermediaries without clear private-capital relevance were excluded or de-emphasized.

Firms did not need to work exclusively with venture managers. Most institutional placement agents operate across private equity, credit, infrastructure, real assets, and other alternative strategies. Broader platforms remained eligible only where venture, growth, emerging-manager, technology-fund, or closely related capital formation was an identifiable and credible part of their work.

Methodology — Ranking Factors

The selected firms were evaluated using a combination of qualitative and structural factors:

• Strength, clarity, and continuity of the private-capital advisory and placement identity
• Relevance to venture capital, growth equity, technology funds, emerging managers, and specialist innovation strategies
• Depth and quality of institutional LP, sovereign, family-office, private-wealth, consultant, and fund-of-funds relationships
• Ability to advise on market positioning, fund size, differentiation, investor materials, diligence preparation, and fundraising sequencing
• Global or regional distribution capabilities across North America, Europe, the Gulf, Asia-Pacific, Canada, and Australia and New Zealand
• Experience with first-time funds, successor vehicles, sector specialists, regional managers, and institutionally established franchises
• Primary placement execution and the ability to sustain investor engagement through long fundraising cycles
• Secondary advisory, co-investment syndication, direct placement, continuation, GP-stakes, or other capital-solutions capabilities where relevant
• Regulatory standing, project-management infrastructure, and ability to coordinate compliant cross-border fundraising
• Senior-team involvement, mandate selectivity, organizational independence, and absence of material conflicts
• Current activity, team continuity, operational traceability, and relevance during the 2026 assessment period
• Credibility among general partners, limited partners, private-market advisers, and other institutional participants

The assessment universe comprised approximately 105 global placement agents, fundraising advisers, GP advisory firms, regional capital-access specialists, emerging-manager advisers, and regulated private-capital platforms. Thirty firms were selected.

Tier classifications reflect relative institutional positioning within the venture capital advisory and placement ecosystem. They do not constitute a fundraising guarantee, investment recommendation, fund-performance ranking, regulatory opinion, due-diligence conclusion, or endorsement of any manager, adviser, fund, or transaction.

Company Profiles and Further Reference

Firm names appearing in this ranking are linked to their corresponding profiles in The Economy Wiki for companies, where available. These profiles provide additional background on each organization, including its principal activities, sector focus, market positioning, leadership, corporate information, and related rankings and analysis across The Economy Network.

The Economy Wiki profiles are maintained as editorial reference pages and may be updated as new public information becomes available.

---

Tier I — Leading Venture Capital Advisory & Placement Platforms

Rede Partners

• Headquarters: London / New York / Los Angeles / Amsterdam / Hong Kong / Dubai, United Kingdom / United States / Netherlands / Hong Kong / United Arab Emirates
• Founded: 2011

Rede Partners is a major independent private-markets advisory firm active in primary fundraising, capital solutions, and strategic advisory. Its international platform serves general partners across private equity, growth, venture, credit, infrastructure, climate, and other private-market strategies.

The firm is particularly relevant where fundraising depends on careful positioning rather than undifferentiated distribution. Venture and growth managers must explain sourcing advantage, fund-size logic, portfolio construction, realizations, and institutional durability to LPs that can compare many competing strategies. Rede’s research, strategic-advisory capability, and global investor coverage support that process.

Rede fits Tier I because it combines scale, independence, senior private-market expertise, and broad LP access while retaining a specialist advisory identity. Its ability to connect primary fundraising with GP capital and wider strategic questions gives it a leading position in the modern capital-formation market.

Asante Capital Group

• Headquarters: London / New York / Los Angeles / Hong Kong / Munich, United Kingdom / United States / Hong Kong / Germany
• Founded: 2010

Asante Capital Group is an independent global private-capital placement and advisory firm working across private equity, growth equity, venture capital, private debt, infrastructure, and real assets. Its offices and investor coverage span major North American, European, Asian, and other international capital pools.

Asante’s model is relevant to venture managers seeking a selective, relationship-driven process with cross-border distribution. It can help managers align fund positioning with the different governance, return, commitment-size, and diligence expectations of institutional investors across regions.

Asante fits Tier I because its global reach is supported by a focused private-capital identity rather than a broad investment-bank balance sheet. Its combination of fundraising execution, strategic input, investor access, and independent positioning makes it one of the category’s clearest institutional leaders.

Monument Group

• Headquarters: Boston / London / Amsterdam / Hong Kong / Tokyo, United States / United Kingdom / Netherlands / Hong Kong / Japan
• Founded: 1994

Monument Group is a long-established independent placement agent and secondaries adviser providing primary fundraising, LP liquidity, GP-led transactions, and broader capital solutions. Its operating history spans multiple private-market cycles and a wide range of alternative strategies.

The firm’s relevance to venture and growth managers comes from its combination of institutional fundraising and liquidity knowledge. A manager raising a successor vehicle may also need to address mature assets, LP portfolio constraints, co-investment demand, or continuation options. Monument can place those questions within one capital-formation framework.

Monument fits Tier I because of its longevity, partner-owned structure, global reach, and durable relationships with general and limited partners. Its senior-led and selective model remains distinctive in a market where many large placement franchises have been absorbed into banks.

Atlantic-Pacific Capital

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 1995

Atlantic-Pacific Capital is an established independent placement and advisory firm active across private equity, venture capital, growth equity, private credit, real assets, and other alternative strategies. Its work includes fund placement, secondary advisory, and direct private placements for managers seeking institutional capital.

The firm’s long operating history provides perspective on how LP priorities change across cycles. That experience is useful to venture managers confronting questions about unrealized value, deployment pacing, strategy drift, team succession, and the relationship between a proposed fund size and the available opportunity set.

Atlantic-Pacific fits Tier I because it combines independence, institutional investor coverage, cross-strategy knowledge, and a clearly defined private-capital placement function. Its venture activity sits within a broader alternatives platform, but its fundraising heritage and global relationships justify leading-tier placement.

Probitas Partners

• Headquarters: San Francisco / New York / London, United States / United Kingdom
• Founded: 2001

Probitas Partners is an independent alternatives placement and advisory firm serving established and differentiated investment managers. Its capabilities span private equity, venture capital, growth, credit, infrastructure, real assets, secondaries, and other private-market strategies.

Its San Francisco presence and research-oriented market perspective provide particular relevance to technology and venture fundraising. Specialist, regional, and emerging managers often benefit from targeted LP matching and disciplined market feedback rather than the broadest possible investor list.

Probitas fits Tier I because it combines institutional credibility, global distribution, independence, and sustained private-market specialization. Its selective approach and ability to compare venture funds with competing alternative allocations make it a strong adviser to managers seeking sophisticated LP capital.

---

Tier II — Established Venture Capital Advisory & Placement Firms

(Alphabetical order)

5Capital

• Headquarters: Chicago / Miami / New York / Los Angeles / Munich / Tel Aviv / Taipei / Sydney, United States / Germany / Israel / Taiwan / Australia
• Founded: 2019

5Capital is an independent placement and advisory firm active in primary fundraising, secondaries, co-investments, and private-capital transactions across venture capital, private equity, credit, infrastructure, and real assets.

Its distributed international network is relevant to managers seeking investor access beyond one domestic market. 5Capital fits Tier II because its cross-border reach, multi-format capital capabilities, and explicit work with venture and emerging-market strategies give it an established role despite its relatively recent founding.

Acalyx Advisors

• Headquarters: Arlington / Chicago / New York / Palm Beach Gardens, United States
• Founded: 2015

Acalyx Advisors is an independent US placement and fundraising adviser to alternative-asset managers. Its completed mandates include buyout, growth equity, healthcare, impact, and venture-oriented funds, including support for newer institutional franchises.

The firm combines advisory preparation with regulated placement execution and maintains visible current fundraising activity. Acalyx fits Tier II because its manager focus, US institutional coverage, active transaction record, and experience with growth and venture strategies give it a stronger operating profile than a narrowly regional boutique.

BerchWood Partners

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2000

BerchWood Partners is an independent global placement agency raising capital for private funds across buyout, growth, venture, infrastructure, real estate, credit, and special-situations strategies.

Its role is especially relevant to mid-market and specialist managers that need focused senior attention and qualified institutional introductions. BerchWood fits Tier II because its long private-funds history, global LP relationships, and ability to support differentiated strategies provide an established platform, although its venture activity forms part of a broader private-equity franchise.

Champlain Advisors

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2003

Champlain Advisors is an independently owned fund-placement, advisory, and investor-relations firm that works with a limited number of alternative-investment managers. Its mandates span venture capital, private equity, credit, infrastructure, energy, and other specialist strategies.

The firm combines a senior advisory team with a global distribution network covering North America, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific. Champlain fits Tier II because its institutional scale, independence, venture eligibility, and selective non-conflicting mandate model create a strong category position.

FIRSTavenue

• Headquarters: London / New York / Dallas / Hong Kong / Sydney, United Kingdom / United States / Hong Kong / Australia
• Founded: 2006

FIRSTavenue is an independent global placement and advisory firm serving private funds and private companies across private equity, venture and growth, credit, real assets, and related strategies. Its capabilities include primary fundraising, capital solutions, and secondary transactions.

The firm’s ability to work across funds, companies, and liquidity situations is relevant to venture managers whose capital needs extend beyond a conventional blind-pool raise. FIRSTavenue fits Tier II because of its global distribution, operational depth, and institutional private-market identity, while its broad strategy mix makes established-tier placement more appropriate than category leadership.

FirstPoint Equity

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2010

FirstPoint Equity is an independent placement agent and capital-solutions adviser offering primary fundraising, secondary, and co-investment services to alternative-asset managers. Its team reports extensive experience across global institutional fundraising assignments.

The firm’s model emphasizes a selective client list, senior involvement, and investor coverage across the United States, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. FirstPoint fits Tier II because its fundraising heritage, capital-solutions range, and international LP access give it substantial institutional relevance, including for growth and innovation-oriented private funds.

Greenstone Equity Partners

• Headquarters: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
• Founded: 2011

Greenstone Equity Partners is a Gulf-focused private-capital placement and advisory firm connecting global managers with sovereign, institutional, family-office, and private-wealth investors across the GCC.

Its regional specialization is increasingly relevant to venture, growth, artificial-intelligence, healthcare, and technology managers seeking capital diversification. Greenstone fits Tier II because its locally embedded investor access, regulatory infrastructure, and dedicated Middle Eastern distribution model provide a differentiated capability that broad global agents may not reproduce through periodic coverage alone.

Jasmin Capital

• Headquarters: Paris, France
• Founded: 2011

Jasmin Capital is an independent private-markets advisory firm serving general and limited partners through primary placement, secondary advisory, co-investment syndication, and related capital solutions. Its work spans private equity, infrastructure, credit, and selected growth-oriented strategies.

The firm offers European managers access to international investors while supporting LPs and GPs across several parts of the capital lifecycle. Jasmin fits Tier II because its integrated placement and secondary capabilities, cross-border orientation, and visible private-markets identity give it an established position, even though venture is not its exclusive strategy.

Stonington Capital Advisors

• Headquarters: New York / Short Hills, United States
• Founded: 2012

Stonington Capital Advisors is an independent placement and advisory firm focused on sub-$1 billion private funds. It provides fund placement, secondary advisory, direct private placements, and strategic guidance to managers across venture capital, buyout, credit, real estate, and other alternatives.

Its fund-size focus is especially relevant to venture and emerging managers that may be overlooked by the largest global agents. Stonington fits Tier II because its partner-led model, explicit venture experience, institutional investor relationships, and active support for specialist funds align closely with the practical needs of this category.

Threadmark

• Headquarters: London / New York / San Francisco / Lisbon, United Kingdom / United States / Portugal
• Founded: 2009

Threadmark is an independent private-markets placement and strategic-advisory firm active in capital raising, business development, sustainability, co-investments, and secondary-related solutions.

The firm is relevant to innovative and differentiated strategies that require investor education as well as distribution. Threadmark fits Tier II because its London and US presence, strategic positioning capability, and cross-border private-market relationships support venture and growth managers even though its wider franchise also covers real assets, credit, and conventional private equity.

---

Tier III — Specialist Venture Capital Advisory & Placement Firms

(Alphabetical order)

Acanthus Capital

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2014

Acanthus Capital is a specialist European placement and advisory firm focused principally on differentiated mid-market private-equity managers. It supports fundraising strategy, positioning, materials, investor access, and selected secondary transactions.

Acanthus fits Tier III because its venture relevance is narrower than that of several higher-tier firms, but its independent model and careful European capital-formation process remain applicable to growth and specialist managers seeking institutional LP relationships.

Agilis Advisors

• Headquarters: Berlin, Germany
• Founded: 2016

Agilis Advisors supports private equity, venture capital, private credit, infrastructure, and real-estate managers through fundraising and secondary-related advisory. Its location gives it useful access to German and wider European private-market ecosystems.

Agilis fits Tier III because it offers hands-on support to emerging, regional, and specialist managers that may require more preparation than large-scale distribution. Its smaller platform is balanced by clear category fit and DACH market relevance.

Allen Partners

• Headquarters: Sydney, Australia
• Founded: 2009

Allen Partners is an Australian capital-advisory and placement firm helping international asset managers raise institutional capital in Australia and New Zealand. Its investor relationships include superannuation funds, institutions, and family offices.

Allen fits Tier III because its value is regional rather than globally comprehensive. For venture and growth managers seeking access to Australasian LPs, local understanding of governance, allocation processes, and relationship development provides a credible specialist advantage.

BEV Capital

• Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
• Founded: 2020

BEV Capital is a boutique placement agent focused on family offices and wealth managers across Europe, the GCC, and Asia. It supports sub-$200 million fund and company raises across venture capital, private equity, credit, and real assets.

BEV fits Tier III because its family-office network and smaller-mandate focus address a segment often underserved by institutional placement agents. Its newer placement identity and private-wealth concentration limit direct comparison with established global firms, while its cross-regional model is clearly relevant to emerging venture managers.

CapEos

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2013

CapEos is an independent FCA-regulated placement agent focused on private-equity and venture-capital funds. It has particular experience with emerging managers in emerging markets and relationships with development institutions, fund-of-funds, asset managers, and family offices.

CapEos fits Tier III because its platform is deliberately compact, but its category purity is unusually strong. Its work with emerging venture managers and development-oriented capital provides a differentiated role within a market whose largest agents often prioritize bigger successor funds.

c*funds

• Headquarters: Amsterdam, Netherlands
• Founded: 2016

c*funds is an independent market adviser and placement specialist serving first- through fifth-generation emerging managers, with a strong orientation toward venture capital. Its services include primary fundraising, co-investments, direct deals, secondaries, GP-stakes support, and pre-marketing preparation.

The firm fits Tier III because it combines hands-on emerging-manager support with international LP relationships and a distinct Benelux base. Its institutional scale remains smaller than that of the established placement firms, but its venture specialization and active fundraising model are directly aligned with the category.

Cohen Brothers

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2007

Cohen Brothers is an international placement agent with European offices and global investor reach. It raises capital across venture capital, growth equity, private equity, credit, infrastructure, real estate, hedge funds, and customized investment structures.

Cohen Brothers fits Tier III because its multi-asset remit is broad, yet its explicit venture and emerging-manager programs, professional-investor focus, and cross-border distribution provide credible specialist relevance. Its platform is more compact than the firms in the established tier.

Colmar Capital

• Headquarters: Zug / Paris / London / Tel Aviv, Switzerland / France / United Kingdom / Israel
• Founded: 2023

Colmar Capital is a boutique placement and advisory firm focused on European mid-market managers, primary fundraising, co-investments, and GP-led secondary transactions. Its partners provide coverage across DACH, the Nordics, France, Benelux, Spain, Italy, the UK, the United States, Israel, and the Gulf.

Colmar fits Tier III because it is a young platform whose primary focus is broader private equity rather than venture alone. Its Swiss base, senior boutique model, and ability to connect European managers with international capital nevertheless make it a relevant emerging specialist.

Denning & Company

• Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: 2001

Denning & Company is a boutique private-funds adviser providing fundraising and consulting services to established and emerging partnerships. Its San Francisco base gives it natural proximity to venture-capital, technology, and innovation-oriented managers.

Denning fits Tier III because it offers tailored strategy, materials, LP mapping, and fundraising support where a manager may not suit a large global placement mandate. Its smaller scale limits institutional comparison, while its longevity and venture-ecosystem relevance support inclusion.

Elm Capital

• Headquarters: London / Lisbon, United Kingdom / Portugal
• Founded: 2004

Elm Capital is an independent private-capital fundraising and liquidity adviser working across private equity, private debt, infrastructure, and real assets. It combines primary placement with secondary and portfolio-management solutions for general and limited partners.

Elm fits Tier III because venture is not its principal franchise, but its emerging-manager experience, European and North American investor relationships, and integrated liquidity knowledge are applicable to growth-oriented private funds. Its senior, selective model provides a credible specialist alternative.

Further Capital Partners

• Headquarters: Toronto, Canada
• Founded: 2006

Further Capital Partners is a Canadian placement agent representing global investment managers to Canadian institutional investors. It offers local market intelligence, investor targeting, and fundraising execution across private and public strategies.

Further fits Tier III because its principal value is geographic specialization. Canadian pensions, institutions, and family offices form a significant but relationship-intensive capital pool, and managers seeking that access can benefit from a locally embedded adviser rather than treating Canada as an extension of US distribution.

M2O Private Fund Advisors

• Headquarters: White Plains / New York, United States
• Founded: 2012

M2O Private Fund Advisors provides primary fundraising, secondary advisory, and direct-equity placement for private fund managers and investors. Its model is centered on customized assignments across several parts of the private-capital lifecycle.

M2O fits Tier III because its flexible capital-solutions approach is relevant where venture managers need to coordinate a fundraise with direct, co-investment, or liquidity requirements. Its institutional footprint is more focused than the established-tier firms, but its active advisory identity remains clear.

Quest Fund Placement

• Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
• Founded: 2004

Quest Fund Placement is an independent UK placement agent focused on fundraising for European private-equity and private-debt managers. Its work emphasizes long-term manager relationships, institutional positioning, and targeted international LP engagement.

Quest fits Tier III because its core mandate is more closely associated with European mid-market private equity than venture capital. Its placement discipline, operating history, and ability to support specialist managers across fragmented European LP markets nevertheless justify inclusion.

S.O. Capital Advice

• Headquarters: Paris, France
• Founded: 2009

S.O. Capital Advice is an independent private-assets adviser serving general and limited partners across fundraising, secondaries, and strategic advisory. It works with managers in Europe, Africa, and North America across private equity, growth capital, credit, infrastructure, and fund-of-funds strategies.

The firm fits Tier III because its European and emerging-market relationships can support regional and growth-oriented managers seeking tailored fundraising preparation. Its smaller organization and broader private-assets remit place it below global firms, while its long operating history and strategic advisory model provide credible specialist value.

Stonehaven

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2001

Stonehaven operates a broker-dealer and private-capital-markets platform supporting independent investment bankers, placement agents, advisers, companies, and sponsors. Its infrastructure spans capital raising, private placements, secondaries, and related transactions.

Stonehaven fits Tier III because it is a network and operating platform rather than a conventional centralized venture placement agent. Its regulated infrastructure, technology-enabled model, and support for specialist capital raisers nevertheless represent an important alternative form of private-market distribution.

---

Remarks

Venture capital advisory and placement is not a venture-only industry. Most leading firms serve managers across several private-market strategies, while a smaller group concentrates on emerging venture funds, regional access, family offices, or specialist innovation strategies. Inclusion reflects meaningful venture and growth relevance within a credible capital-formation platform, not exclusivity.

The 2026 market increases the importance of manager selection and fundraising preparation. Strong company-level investment can coexist with concentrated fund formation, difficult conditions for first-time managers, and longer diligence cycles. Advisers must help managers explain strategy, fund size, portfolio construction, realization pathways, and organizational durability without relying on market enthusiasm as a substitute for evidence.

Regional specialists remain important even as the largest placement firms expand globally. Gulf investors, Canadian institutions, Australian superannuation funds, European family offices, development-finance institutions, and US endowments do not operate through identical governance or relationship structures. Local access is most valuable when it is combined with realistic mandate selection, regulatory discipline, and a clear understanding of how the manager fits the investor’s portfolio.

The growing interaction among primary fundraising, co-investments, secondaries, continuation solutions, direct placements, and GP capital means that placement advisers increasingly operate across the manager’s full capital lifecycle. That expansion can improve strategic coherence, but it also makes independence, conflict management, and clarity of role more important.

Tier classification reflects relative institutional positioning within the venture capital advisory and placement segment. It does not represent fundraising performance, a guarantee of capital raised, investment advice, regulatory approval, an endorsement of any service provider, or a recommendation to engage any firm.

---

Recognition

Inclusion in the Top 30 Venture Capital Advisory & Placement 2026 ranking is an editorial determination of The Economy Rankings and is independent of licensing, advertising, sponsorship, or other commercial participation.

Ranked organizations may factually refer to their inclusion in the ranking in their own communications. When describing the result, firms should accurately reflect the tier structure and methodology used in the published ranking.

How the ranking should be interpreted

• Tier I represents the Top 5 firms, and the published order within Tier I reflects the ranking order.
• Tier II represents firms ranked within the Top 15, following Tier I. Firms within Tier II are displayed alphabetically; their displayed order should therefore not be interpreted as an individual numerical ranking.
• Tier III represents firms ranked within the Top 30, following Tiers I and II. Firms within Tier III are also displayed alphabetically, and their displayed order should not be interpreted as an individual numerical ranking.
• A firm's tier, rather than its alphabetical position within Tier II or Tier III, should therefore be used when describing its standing.

Referencing the ranking

Depending on the firm's published tier, appropriate factual descriptions may include:

• Tier I: “Ranked Tier I” or “Ranked among the Top 5”
• Tier II: “Ranked Tier II” or “Ranked among the Top 15”
• Tier III: “Ranked Tier III” or “Ranked among the Top 30”

Firms should not describe an alphabetical position within Tier II or Tier III as a specific numerical rank.

Use of The Economy Rankings recognition materials

Editorial inclusion in a ranking does NOT by itself grant permission to use The Economy Rankings badges, seals, logos, official recognition graphics, licensed quotations, or other proprietary recognition materials.

Organizations wishing to use official The Economy Rankings recognition materials in corporate websites, marketing materials, investor communications, client presentations, social media, press releases, or other external communications should refer to the applicable licensing terms and usage policies:

• The Economy Rankings License Structure — available licence levels and permitted recognition uses
  Rankings License Structure | The Economy
• The Economy Rankings License Policy — licensing conditions governing use of The Economy Rankings recognition, marks, and related materials
  The Economy Rankings License Policy | The Economy
• Recognition Use Guide — guidance on permitted wording, presentation, attribution, and use of ranking recognition
  Recognition Use Guide | The Economy

Ranking inclusion remains editorially independent regardless of whether an organization purchases or holds a recognition-materials licence.

Recognized institutions may reference the designation in:

• corporate websites
• investor communications
• marketing materials
• client presentations

Licensing inquiries:
[email protected]