Top 30 Telemedicine Providers 2026

This report forms part of The Economy Rankings Healthcare Ranking series, which evaluates hospitals, medical institutions, pharmaceutical organizations, medical technology companies, diagnostics providers, laboratories, precision medicine platforms, pharmaceutical services providers, medical technology firms, and healthcare systems across global healthcare markets.

Telemedicine providers occupy a core position within digital healthcare by enabling patients to access clinicians remotely through video visits, asynchronous messaging, phone consultations, virtual urgent care, virtual primary care, behavioral health, specialist access, prescription services, and chronic care support. Their role has evolved from pandemic-era convenience into a permanent access channel for health systems, employers, payers, and consumers.

Unlike broader digital health platforms that may focus on analytics, benefits navigation, population health, or remote monitoring, telemedicine providers are evaluated here primarily on their ability to deliver or enable remote clinical encounters. Their institutional relevance depends on clinician network depth, care quality, payer and employer integration, patient experience, regulatory compliance, prescription workflows, data security, and ability to connect virtual care with ongoing medical management.

The telemedicine market has matured substantially since the rapid adoption period of 2020–2021. Basic video urgent care has become more commoditized, while stronger providers now compete through integrated virtual primary care, behavioral health, women’s health, chronic disease management, direct-to-consumer prescription access, employer programs, health plan partnerships, and hybrid virtual-in-person care.

This ranking identifies telemedicine providers whose platforms demonstrate sustained relevance across virtual care delivery, clinical access, enterprise adoption, consumer reach, provider network quality, and long-term care integration. Rather than focusing only on visit volume or app visibility, the objective is to recognize specific license-targetable firms whose telemedicine platforms remain commercially meaningful within global healthcare.

Market Overview

The telemedicine market includes several operating models. The first is enterprise virtual care, where companies such as Teladoc Health, Amwell, MDLIVE, Included Health, and Accolade Care provide remote care services to employers, health plans, health systems, and large member populations. Teladoc reported first-quarter 2026 results and continues to describe itself as a global leader in virtual care, while Amwell’s platform is positioned as virtual care infrastructure for payers, providers, and consumers.

The second model is payer-owned or payer-integrated telemedicine. MDLIVE, owned by Evernorth, is a strong example: Evernorth describes MDLIVE as a virtual care platform spanning primary care, urgent care, behavioral health, dermatology, and women’s health, with 62 million members and more than 2,000 providers holding 7,900 licenses.

The third model is hybrid virtual-primary-care access. Amazon One Medical provides on-demand virtual care for common conditions as well as membership-based primary care connected to physical One Medical offices, with Amazon describing pay-per-visit virtual care for more than 30 common conditions and upfront pricing for message and video care.

The fourth model is consumer telehealth and digital pharmacy. Hims & Hers, Ro, PlushCare, Sesame, GoodRx Care, Lemonaid Health, Nurx, and similar platforms focus on direct-to-consumer access for urgent care, primary care, sexual health, dermatology, mental health, weight management, contraception, hair loss, and prescription fulfillment. Sesame, for example, positions itself as a cash-pay marketplace for telehealth and in-person visits with licensed providers across all 50 U.S. states.

The fifth model is specialist or category-focused virtual care. Maven Clinic, Talkspace, Spring Health, Grow Therapy, Thirty Madison, and others provide telemedicine in areas such as women’s health, behavioral health, chronic care, and specialist-led digital clinics. These providers are increasingly important because the market is shifting from generic “online doctor” visits toward condition-specific remote care models.

Industry Trend — 2026

The telemedicine industry in 2026 is shaped by five major trends: post-pandemic normalization, hybrid care, behavioral health demand, consumer prescription platforms, and employer-payer integration.

First, telemedicine has moved from emergency adoption to normalized care delivery. The strongest companies are no longer valued only for video-visit availability; they must demonstrate clinical quality, patient retention, cost savings, care coordination, and integration with health plans or provider systems.

Second, hybrid care is becoming more important. Amazon One Medical’s combination of virtual care and physical primary care offices reflects a broader market direction: many patients want convenient remote access, but complex, preventive, and longitudinal care often still requires in-person examination, diagnostics, or follow-up.

Third, behavioral health remains one of the strongest telemedicine categories. Therapy, psychiatry, coaching, and mental health navigation fit remote delivery particularly well, and firms such as Talkspace, Spring Health, Grow Therapy, Headspace, Included Health, and MDLIVE remain important in this segment.

Fourth, consumer prescription telehealth continues to expand. Hims & Hers, Ro, Amazon One Medical, Lemonaid Health, Nurx, and Sesame connect remote clinician review with prescription access, pharmacy fulfillment, and direct pricing. Amazon’s 2026 GLP-1 weight-management program through One Medical illustrates how telemedicine is increasingly tied to longitudinal medication programs rather than one-off visits.

Fifth, employers and payers remain central distribution channels. Virtual care companies that can integrate with benefit plans, health plan networks, employer programs, and navigation platforms are better positioned than standalone consumer-only providers. Included Health’s 2026 employer-focused alternative plan design reflects this movement toward virtual care plus navigation plus benefit design.

Methodology — Core Eligibility Criteria

To ensure structural consistency within the category, organizations considered for this ranking were evaluated based on the following eligibility conditions:

• Operates as a telemedicine provider, virtual care company, virtual primary care platform, online doctor service, digital clinic, behavioral telehealth provider, or telehealth-enabled prescription platform
• Provides services such as video visits, asynchronous virtual care, urgent care, virtual primary care, behavioral health, dermatology, women’s health, prescription access, chronic care, specialist teleconsultation, or employer / payer virtual care
• Maintains meaningful institutional scale through provider networks, payer relationships, employer contracts, consumer adoption, health-system partnerships, national reach, or public-market presence
• Demonstrates relevance in clinical access, remote care delivery, virtual triage, prescription workflows, care continuity, behavioral health, or hybrid care models
• Represents a specific license-targetable operating organization, rather than a broad ecosystem category, industry association, informal network, or generic platform label

Pure scheduling tools, wellness-only apps, remote monitoring companies without telemedicine delivery, software vendors without meaningful clinical care access, and early-stage telehealth startups without sufficient scale were generally excluded.

Methodology — Ranking Factors

Organizations included in the ranking were evaluated using a combination of qualitative and structural considerations rather than short-term valuation alone. Key factors considered include:

• Scale and maturity of telemedicine platform
• Breadth of virtual care services and clinical specialties
• Strength of clinician network, care quality systems, and patient safety governance
• Employer, payer, health-system, or direct-to-consumer adoption
• Ability to support urgent care, primary care, behavioral health, chronic care, and prescription workflows
• Integration with pharmacy, diagnostics, benefits navigation, or hybrid care
• Regulatory compliance, privacy, state licensure management, and prescription safeguards
• Institutional stability, brand reputation, and long-term platform resilience

The objective of the ranking is to identify telemedicine providers whose platforms maintain sustained relevance within the global healthcare ecosystem.

The Healthcare Ranking Top 30 Telemedicine Providers 2026 ranking evaluates companies based on virtual care scale, clinical access, provider network strength, employer and payer relevance, consumer reach, service breadth, and long-term institutional resilience.

The ranking universe consisted of approximately 150 telemedicine and virtual care providers globally, from which 30 organizations were selected for inclusion.

Tier classifications reflect relative institutional positioning within the telemedicine provider sector and do not represent clinical recommendations, procurement advice, investment recommendations, or endorsement of any specific virtual care service.

---

Company Profiles and Further Reference

Organization names appearing in this ranking are linked to their corresponding profiles in The Economy Wiki for companies. These profiles provide additional background on each institution, including its principal activities, clinical or commercial focus, market positioning, leadership, corporate information, related rankings, and analysis across The Economy Network.

The Economy Wiki profiles are maintained as editorial reference pages and may be updated as new public information becomes available. A linked profile does not affect ranking eligibility or tier classification.

---

Tier I — Leading Telemedicine Providers

Teladoc Health

• Headquarters: Purchase, United States
• Founded: 2002

Teladoc Health remains one of the most recognized telemedicine providers globally and one of the defining companies in virtual care. Its platform supports virtual urgent care, primary care, mental health, chronic condition management, specialist access, and enterprise healthcare programs for employers, payers, and health systems.

Teladoc’s strength lies in scale and category leadership. The company helped institutionalize telemedicine as a mainstream healthcare access channel and continues to operate across multiple care categories rather than relying only on episodic urgent care. This breadth gives it relevance in employer-sponsored virtual care, health plan networks, behavioral health, and chronic care programs.

The company also reflects the maturity of the telemedicine market. After pandemic-era hypergrowth, broad telehealth companies have had to manage slower utilization growth, competitive pressure, and greater investor scrutiny. Teladoc’s 2026 financial reporting shows that it remains a major virtual care platform, but one operating in a more disciplined market environment.

Teladoc’s global brand, enterprise relationships, clinical service breadth, chronic care assets, and long-standing telemedicine infrastructure support its position as a Tier I telemedicine provider in 2026.

MDLIVE / Evernorth

• Headquarters: Miramar, United States / Evernorth headquarters: St. Louis, United States
• Founded: 2009

MDLIVE, part of Evernorth, is one of the most important telemedicine providers in the United States. Its platform provides virtual care across urgent care, primary care, behavioral health, dermatology, and women’s health, with deep integration into payer, employer, and benefits ecosystems.

MDLIVE’s strength lies in payer integration and clinical network scale. Evernorth describes MDLIVE as serving 62 million members, supported by more than 2,000 providers with 7,900 licenses. This infrastructure is particularly important in U.S. telemedicine, where provider licensure, payer access, network design, and claims integration strongly affect service adoption.

The platform has also expanded through asynchronous care and navigation capabilities. Evernorth’s acquisition of Bright.md technology was intended to enhance MDLIVE’s virtual care experience through asynchronous care, triage, and navigation capabilities.

MDLIVE’s payer-backed model, broad virtual service lines, provider network scale, and integration with Evernorth’s healthcare services platform support its Tier I position.

Amwell

• Headquarters: Boston, United States
• Founded: 2006

Amwell is one of the most established enterprise telemedicine platforms, focused on enabling health systems, payers, employers, and providers to deliver virtual care. Its model differs from consumer-first telemedicine brands because Amwell often operates as infrastructure for organizations that want to provide telehealth through their own networks and workflows.

Amwell’s strength lies in enterprise virtual care enablement. The company’s platform links telehealth transactions across payers, providers, and consumers and supports a connected care experience for healthcare organizations. This makes Amwell especially relevant for hospitals and health plans that want telemedicine embedded into their existing care delivery structure.

The company is navigating a challenging market, including revenue pressure and strategic transformation. Recent reporting noted first-quarter 2026 revenue decline but also highlighted management discussion of AI, contract renewals, and retention.

Amwell’s enterprise orientation, health-system relationships, payer platform capabilities, and long-standing virtual care infrastructure support its inclusion among leading telemedicine providers.

Included Health

• Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: 2020 through combination of Grand Rounds Health and Doctor On Demand

Included Health is a leading virtual care and navigation company combining telemedicine, primary care, behavioral health, specialty guidance, benefits navigation, and member advocacy. Its model reflects the shift from standalone telemedicine visits toward integrated healthcare access and navigation.

Included Health’s strength lies in combining virtual care delivery with broader healthcare coordination. Patients frequently need more than a video visit: they need help understanding benefits, finding specialists, managing bills, coordinating follow-up, and choosing appropriate care. Included Health’s platform addresses this broader access problem.

The company describes its services as personalized virtual care and navigation for employers, including support for care needs ranging from common illnesses to anxiety and benefits issues. Its 2026 launch of an alternative plan design for employers further demonstrates the company’s movement from virtual care vendor toward benefit-integrated healthcare platform.

Included Health’s virtual care capabilities, employer channel, navigation model, and integration of clinical and administrative support justify its Tier I position.

Amazon One Medical

• Headquarters: Seattle, United States / One Medical headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: One Medical founded 2007; acquired by Amazon in 2023

Amazon One Medical is one of the most strategically important telemedicine providers because it combines Amazon’s consumer infrastructure with One Medical’s hybrid primary care model. The platform offers on-demand virtual care for common conditions as well as membership-based primary care connected to physical clinics.

Amazon’s strength lies in consumer access, pricing transparency, pharmacy integration, and hybrid care. Amazon One Medical offers pay-per-visit telehealth for more than 30 common conditions, with direct message and video care pricing stated upfront, while membership gives users access to ongoing virtual care and physical One Medical offices.

The platform’s 2026 GLP-1 weight-management program illustrates how Amazon is expanding telemedicine into chronic medication-supported care, with remote consultations, ongoing monitoring, and Amazon Pharmacy integration.

Amazon One Medical’s hybrid model, consumer brand, telehealth pricing transparency, pharmacy connection, and growth potential support its position among the leading telemedicine providers in 2026.

---

Tier II — Established Telemedicine Providers

(Alphabetical order)

Accolade Care / PlushCare

• Headquarters: Seattle / San Francisco, United States
• Founded: Accolade founded 2007; PlushCare founded 2014

Accolade Care, built in part on PlushCare’s virtual primary care model, is an established telemedicine and healthcare navigation platform. The company supports virtual primary care, mental health treatment, benefits navigation, and personalized healthcare support for employer populations.

Accolade completed its acquisition of PlushCare in 2021, describing PlushCare as a leading provider of virtual primary care and mental health treatment. Accolade Care later positioned the combined service as virtual primary and mental health care, leveraging the PlushCare primary care model for employees and families.

The platform’s relevance lies in combining telemedicine with benefits navigation. Employer-sponsored healthcare often requires more than a clinician visit; members need guidance across coverage, provider selection, prescription access, and follow-up care.

Accolade Care / PlushCare’s virtual primary care base, mental health services, employer channel, and navigation infrastructure support its inclusion among established telemedicine providers.

Circle Medical

• Core focus: technology-enabled virtual and in-person primary care

Circle Medical is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in technology-enabled virtual and in-person primary care. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. Circle Medical contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

Circle Medical is placed in Tier II because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

Doctor Anywhere

• Core focus: Southeast Asian telehealth, diagnostics and care navigation

Doctor Anywhere is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in Southeast Asian telehealth, diagnostics and care navigation. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. Doctor Anywhere contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

Doctor Anywhere is placed in Tier II because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

GoodRx Care

• Headquarters: Santa Monica, United States
• Founded: GoodRx founded 2011

GoodRx Care is the telemedicine and prescription-access extension of GoodRx’s consumer healthcare platform. It supports online consultations, prescription access, and medication affordability workflows for patients seeking convenient digital care.

GoodRx’s strength lies in medication access. Many telemedicine encounters involve common conditions and prescription needs, and GoodRx is already deeply associated with pharmacy price transparency and consumer medication savings. GoodRx Care extends that consumer relationship into remote clinician access.

The platform is especially relevant for straightforward conditions where patients need convenient evaluation and prescription support. It competes with Hims & Hers, Ro, Amazon One Medical, Sesame, and other consumer-oriented telehealth providers.

GoodRx Care’s pharmacy-adjacent model, consumer brand, medication affordability focus, and online consultation capability support its inclusion among established telemedicine providers.

Hims & Hers Health

• Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: 2017

Hims & Hers Health is one of the most successful consumer telemedicine providers, with a platform spanning digital consultations, prescriptions, pharmacy fulfillment, sexual health, dermatology, mental health, hair loss, and weight management. It has built a recognizable direct-to-consumer brand around conditions where patients value convenience, discretion, and recurring access.

Hims & Hers’ strength lies in combining telemedicine with commerce and pharmacy infrastructure. Patients can complete digital intake, receive clinician review, obtain prescriptions where appropriate, and receive medications through an integrated digital experience.

The company has expanded into weight management, preventive testing, and broader health programs, reflecting the market shift from episodic telemedicine toward longitudinal consumer care. Its direct-to-patient scale and brand visibility make it one of the most license-targetable firms in the category.

Hims & Hers’ consumer reach, integrated prescription model, brand strength, and expanding telehealth service lines support its inclusion among established telemedicine providers.

Maven Clinic

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2014

Maven Clinic is one of the leading category-specific telemedicine providers, focused on women’s and family health. Its platform supports virtual care, care navigation, specialist access, fertility, pregnancy, maternity, postpartum care, parenting, pediatrics, menopause, and family benefits.

Maven’s strength lies in specialty virtual care for an underserved and high-cost area of healthcare. Women’s and family health often involves fragmented care across OB-GYN, fertility clinics, pediatricians, mental health providers, and benefits administrators. Maven provides a digital platform to coordinate these needs.

The company’s employer and payer channel gives it institutional relevance beyond consumer app usage. Maven’s Series F financing supported investment in fertility benefits administration and virtual care delivery, reinforcing its position as a leading private telemedicine platform in women’s health.

Maven Clinic’s specialty focus, virtual provider network, employer distribution, and women’s health leadership support its inclusion among established telemedicine providers.

Ro

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2017

Ro is a major consumer telemedicine platform providing online consultations, prescriptions, digital pharmacy access, diagnostics-adjacent services, weight management, sexual health, dermatology, and fertility-related care. It competes directly with Hims & Hers, Amazon One Medical, GoodRx Care, and other direct-to-consumer care platforms.

Ro’s strength lies in consumer telehealth infrastructure. Its model combines online intake, clinician review, prescription fulfillment, and condition-specific care programs. This gives it relevance in categories where patients want convenient and private access to care.

The company has become especially relevant in obesity and GLP-1-related care, a major growth category for consumer telemedicine. Weight-management telemedicine requires more longitudinal clinical oversight than one-time urgent care, which makes Ro’s platform more strategically important if it can sustain clinical quality and patient retention.

Ro’s consumer brand, prescription infrastructure, weight-management presence, and condition-specific telehealth model support its inclusion among established providers.

Sesame

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2018

Sesame is a telemedicine and healthcare marketplace focused on direct cash-pay access to clinicians. Its platform allows patients to book telehealth visits and in-person appointments with upfront pricing, without relying on insurance billing for the core marketplace experience.

Sesame’s strength lies in price transparency and marketplace structure. Many U.S. patients face high deductibles, limited networks, or difficulty finding timely appointments. Sesame addresses this by connecting patients directly with licensed healthcare providers and displaying prices before booking.

Sesame states that it offers licensed providers across all 50 states, 24/7 access, telehealth visits starting at stated prices, and same-day prescriptions where appropriate. This makes it especially relevant for patients seeking straightforward, transparent, and affordable virtual visits.

Sesame’s cash-pay marketplace model, national access, pricing transparency, and consumer telemedicine positioning support its inclusion among established providers.

Talkspace

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2012

Talkspace is one of the leading behavioral telemedicine providers, focused on online therapy, psychiatry, messaging-based mental health support, and employer and payer mental health programs. It helped mainstream digital therapy and remains one of the most recognized names in remote behavioral health.

Talkspace’s strength lies in behavioral health specialization. Mental health care is one of the most suitable areas for remote delivery because therapy and psychiatric follow-up can often be conducted virtually, and patients may value privacy and convenience.

The company competes with Spring Health, Headspace, Grow Therapy, BetterHelp, Lyra Health, and others, but its public-company profile and established brand give it ongoing relevance. Its payer and employer relationships also support more durable access beyond direct consumer subscriptions.

Talkspace’s behavioral telehealth focus, brand recognition, therapy network, and psychiatry services support its inclusion among established telemedicine providers.

Zocdoc

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2007

Zocdoc is a healthcare marketplace that helps patients find providers, compare appointment availability, and book care, including telehealth visits. Although it is not a pure telemedicine provider, its role in connecting patients to remote and in-person care makes it structurally relevant to telemedicine access.

Zocdoc’s strength lies in discovery and scheduling. Patients often struggle to find available providers, verify insurance, and book timely appointments. Zocdoc reduces this friction by creating a searchable access layer across specialties and care settings.

The platform is especially relevant because telemedicine is increasingly integrated into hybrid care rather than isolated as a separate service. Patients may choose between virtual and in-person appointments depending on condition, availability, and provider preference.

Zocdoc’s provider marketplace, appointment infrastructure, consumer recognition, and telehealth booking capability support its inclusion among established telemedicine providers.

---

Tier III — Specialist Telemedicine Providers

(Alphabetical order)

Carbon Health

• Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
• Founded: 2015

Carbon Health is a hybrid healthcare provider combining urgent care clinics, primary care, and virtual care. Its platform supports patients who need convenient access across in-person and remote settings.

Carbon’s strength lies in hybrid access. Many telemedicine cases require diagnostic testing, physical examination, vaccination, imaging referral, or follow-up that may be better supported through connected clinics. Carbon’s model links digital access with physical sites.

Although Carbon has adjusted its growth strategy in recent years, its hybrid urgent care and virtual care model remains relevant to the evolution of telemedicine.

eVisit

• Core focus: enterprise virtual-care infrastructure for health systems

eVisit is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in enterprise virtual-care infrastructure for health systems. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. eVisit contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

eVisit is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

Galileo

• Core focus: virtual primary care and complex-care management

Galileo is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in virtual primary care and complex-care management. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. Galileo contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

Galileo is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

Halodoc

• Core focus: Indonesian telemedicine, pharmacy and healthcare access platform

Halodoc is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in Indonesian telemedicine, pharmacy and healthcare access platform. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. Halodoc contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

Halodoc is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

HealthTap

• Core focus: virtual primary and urgent care services

HealthTap is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in virtual primary and urgent care services. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. HealthTap contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

HealthTap is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

K Health

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: 2016

K Health is a telemedicine provider focused on AI-assisted virtual primary care and online urgent care. Its platform uses symptom information and clinical data to support triage, patient intake, and remote clinician encounters.

K Health’s strength lies in combining digital triage with clinician access. Telemedicine platforms increasingly need to route patients appropriately, collect structured intake information, and support clinicians with data before a visit begins.

The company’s AI-assisted intake model and virtual care focus make it a relevant specialist provider in the telemedicine market.

Kry / Livi

• Core focus: European digital primary care and virtual consultations

Kry / Livi is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in European digital primary care and virtual consultations. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. Kry / Livi contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

Kry / Livi is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

Nurx / Thirty Madison

• Headquarters: New York, United States
• Founded: Nurx founded 2015; Thirty Madison founded 2017

Nurx, now part of Thirty Madison, is a specialist telemedicine brand focused on contraception, sexual health, dermatology, and related consumer healthcare categories. Thirty Madison also operates other condition-specific digital clinics, giving the combined company a broader chronic and specialty telehealth model.

Nurx’s strength lies in focused, discreet, prescription-enabled care. Contraception, STI testing, acne, hair loss, migraine, and related categories are well suited to asynchronous telemedicine and recurring medication management.

The combined Thirty Madison platform reflects the market shift toward condition-specific digital clinics rather than generic online urgent care. Its specialist telehealth identity supports its Tier III inclusion.

Practo

• Core focus: Indian digital health access, appointments and teleconsultation

Practo is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in Indian digital health access, appointments and teleconsultation. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. Practo contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

Practo is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

Rula

• Headquarters: Los Angeles, United States
• Founded: 2019

Rula, formerly Path Mental Health, is a behavioral telemedicine provider connecting patients with therapists and mental health clinicians. Its model emphasizes insurance-covered mental health access and provider network expansion.

Rula’s strength lies in addressing behavioral health access barriers. Many patients struggle to find therapists accepting insurance, offering virtual care, and available within a reasonable timeframe. Rula’s platform is designed to reduce that friction.

Its mental health specialization and teletherapy network make it a relevant specialist telemedicine provider.

SteadyMD

• Core focus: clinical workforce and infrastructure for virtual-care programs

SteadyMD is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in clinical workforce and infrastructure for virtual-care programs. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. SteadyMD contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

SteadyMD is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

Summus Global

• Core focus: virtual specialist access and second-opinion services

Summus Global is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in virtual specialist access and second-opinion services. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. Summus Global contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

Summus Global is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

Transcarent

• Core focus: virtual care, navigation and employer health access

Transcarent is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in virtual care, navigation and employer health access. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. Transcarent contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

Transcarent is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

Virtuwell / HealthPartners

• Headquarters: Bloomington, United States
• Founded: Virtuwell launched 2010

Virtuwell, operated by HealthPartners, is a specialist telemedicine service focused on asynchronous online diagnosis and treatment for common conditions. It represents an important model of health-system-linked virtual care.

Virtuwell’s strength lies in structured asynchronous care. Not every telemedicine encounter requires a video visit. For selected low-acuity conditions, guided digital intake and clinician review can provide efficient and appropriate treatment.

Its long operating history, health-system connection, and asynchronous care model support its inclusion among specialist telemedicine providers.

Wheel

• Core focus: white-label virtual-care delivery and clinician infrastructure

Wheel is an established healthcare institution whose principal relevance to this ranking lies in white-label virtual-care delivery and clinician infrastructure. Its inclusion reflects an operating platform that is active, institutionally visible, and sufficiently developed to be assessed alongside other consequential participants in telemedicine Providers.

Within this category, the important distinction is not scale alone. Buyers, patients, health systems, life-sciences sponsors, clinicians, or institutional partners—depending on the service—also need evidence of specialist depth, delivery infrastructure, governance, geographic reach, and the ability to support demanding use cases over time. Wheel contributes a credible combination of these characteristics.

Wheel is placed in Tier III because its category-specific capabilities are meaningful and commercially established, while its overall breadth, market influence, or international reach remains more focused than the institutions placed above it. The classification is intended as an editorial assessment of institutional position rather than a medical, investment, or procurement recommendation.

---

Remarks

Telemedicine providers continue to play an important role in healthcare access by enabling remote urgent care, virtual primary care, behavioral health, prescription access, women’s health, specialist consultations, and hybrid care coordination. The category has matured beyond pandemic-era video visits into a more segmented market involving enterprise virtual care, payer-integrated platforms, consumer digital clinics, behavioral telehealth, and hybrid primary care.

The organizations recognized in this ranking represent firms whose platforms maintain sustained relevance across remote clinical encounters, clinician networks, virtual primary care, behavioral health, digital prescription workflows, employer and payer access, and consumer telemedicine. Tier classification reflects relative institutional positioning within the telemedicine provider sector rather than direct clinical quality rankings.

Tier classification reflects relative platform scale, clinical service breadth, provider network strength, enterprise adoption, consumer reach, regulatory capability, patient experience, and long-term resilience. The ranking does not constitute a medical recommendation, procurement recommendation, investment recommendation, or endorsement of any specific telemedicine service.

---

Recognition

Inclusion in the Top 30 Telemedicine Providers 2026 ranking is an editorial determination of The Economy Rankings and is independent of licensing, advertising, sponsorship, or other commercial participation.

Ranked organizations may factually refer to their inclusion in the ranking in their own communications. When describing the result, institutions should accurately reflect the tier structure and methodology used in the published ranking.

How the ranking should be interpreted

• Tier I represents the Top 5 institutions, and the published order within Tier I reflects the ranking order.
• Tier II represents institutions ranked within the Top 15, following Tier I. Institutions within Tier II are displayed alphabetically; their displayed order should therefore not be interpreted as an individual numerical ranking.
• Tier III represents institutions ranked within the Top 30, following Tiers I and II. Institutions within Tier III are also displayed alphabetically, and their displayed order should not be interpreted as an individual numerical ranking.
• An institution’s tier, rather than its alphabetical position within Tier II or Tier III, should therefore be used when describing its standing.

Referencing the ranking

Depending on the institution’s published tier, appropriate factual descriptions may include:

• Tier I: “Ranked Tier I” or “Ranked among the Top 5”
• Tier II: “Ranked Tier II” or “Ranked among the Top 15”
• Tier III: “Ranked Tier III” or “Ranked among the Top 30”

Organizations should not describe an alphabetical position within Tier II or Tier III as a specific numerical rank.

Use of The Economy Rankings recognition materials

Editorial inclusion in a ranking does NOT by itself grant permission to use The Economy Rankings badges, seals, logos, official recognition graphics, licensed quotations, or other proprietary recognition materials.

Organizations wishing to use official The Economy Rankings recognition materials in corporate websites, marketing materials, investor communications, patient or professional communications, presentations, social media, press releases, or other external communications should refer to the applicable licensing terms and usage policies:

• The Economy Rankings License Structure — available licence levels and permitted recognition uses
  Rankings License Structure | The Economy
• The Economy Rankings License Policy — licensing conditions governing use of The Economy Rankings recognition, marks, and related materials
  The Economy Rankings License Policy | The Economy
• Recognition Use Guide — guidance on permitted wording, presentation, attribution, and use of ranking recognition
  Recognition Use Guide | The Economy

Ranking inclusion remains editorially independent regardless of whether an organization purchases or holds a recognition-materials licence.

Licensing inquiries:
[email protected]